A white supremacist recently said on Twitter that “interracial marriage is tantamount to murder.”

That tweet went viral. It received almost a million views and thousands of mostly critical replies from commenters.

Most people, whether they’re leftists or conservatives, know it’s racist to suggest “interracial” marriages murder white people. We know it’s ridiculous to believe a black person who marries a white spouse is guilty of participating in a genocide of the “white race.”

However, when LGBT activists suggest “interracial marriage is tantamount to sexual perversion,” or “a black person’s skin color is unnatural,” or “a black person’s skin color is an abomination,” many people in our culture do not consider that racist.

Of course, that isn’t what they explicitly say about “interracial” marriage or black people. But it’s been their implicit messaging for decades.

The LGBT movement is filled with racist dogma and racist comparisons that present black skin as queer in order to normalize homosexuality and transgenderism. By comparing “interracial” marriage to gay “marriage” and homosexual orientation to a black person’s skin color—the LGBT movement essentially condemns black skin as a sin in order to present homosexuality as righteous behavior.

By referring to themselves as the new civil rights movement, the LGBT movement has said for decades that opposition to homosexual (and transgender) behavior is tantamount to racial discrimination. They also say opposition to gay “marriage” is just like anti-miscegenation sentiments that banned marriages between white people and black people.

This is because they fundamentally believe a homosexual person’s sexual orientation is just as immutable as a black person’s skin color. Therefore, according to them, they can’t change their sexual orientation the same way a black person like me can’t change my skin color.

The LGBT movement is filled with racist dogma and racist comparisons that present black skin as queer in order to normalize homosexuality and transgenderism.

It’s telling that in a culture where everything is considered racist, it’s apparently not racist to compare a black person’s skin color to sexual perversion. Through concepts like microaggressions and implicit bias, leftists have concocted all sorts of silly ways to falsely accuse people of racism—yet they refuse to acknowledge obviously racist aspects of LGBT ideology.

In the intersectional kingdom, LGBT people reign as kings and (drag) queens.

And their racist decree is this: if homosexuality is a sin, then a black person’s skin color is also a sin. Or if gay “marriage” is a sin, then “interracial” marriage is also a sin.

That argument is actually why Democrats said last year that if the Supreme Court overturns Obergefell v. Hodges, the ruling which affirms gay “marriage”—as Justice Clarence Thomas said they should in his concurring opinion overturning Roe v. Wade—then the Supreme Court would also supposedly overturn Loving v. Virginia. Which, the Democrats claimed, would make Republican states ban interracial marriage.

In the intersectional kingdom, LGBT people reign as kings and (drag) queens.

This ridiculous claim is what prompted President Joe Biden and the Democrats to pass the so-called Respect for Marriage Act, a law that codifies “interracial” marriage and especially gay “marriage” as federal law.

Nevertheless, the major logical problem with comparing a homosexual person’s sexual “orientation” with a black person’s skin color is this: a homosexual person’s sexual orientation describes their attractions or actions, but a black person’s skin color describes our appearance.

Meaning, it’s comparing something that God does—creation—with something that sinners do: sexual sin.

What God does is always good, but what sinners do isn’t always good. In fact, a black person is made in the image of God. People who commit homosexual sin are also made in the image of God. They are a reflection of God’s attributes. But homosexual sin, like all sin, isn’t a reflection of God’s attributes. Instead, it’s a rejection of God’s revelation in nature and a rejection of God’s revelation in the Bible.

Leviticus 18:22 says: “You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.”

Romans 1:26-27 says: “For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error.”

Therefore when people say that opposition to homosexuality or transgenderism is just like racism against black people, they’re suggesting a black person’s skin color is an abomination.

And when they say that gay “marriage” is like “interracial” marriage, they’re suggesting “interracial” marriages are unnatural. But gay “marriage” isn’t like “interracial” marriage. There’s no difference between so-called interracial married couples like me and my wife and truly married couples who share the same skin color.

God didn’t say, “a black man will leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his black wife, and they shall become one flesh.” No, he says: “a man will leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh” (Genesis 2:24).

“Interracial” marriages are just like other, real marriages. Gay “marriages,” however, are radically different. Two men cannot become one flesh. That’s why they can’t reproduce. They are not a match for each other. Unlike real marriages between one man and one woman—they were not created for each other.

So “interracial” marriages are not like gay “marriages” and a black person’s skin color isn’t like a homosexual person’s sexual sin.

My skin isn’t like sin. LGBT activists who say that have more in common with white supremacists than black people.